This post is part of our series on Wikipedia for Marketing
How can I use Wikipedia to market my small business?
A common question in Wikipedia webinars and workshops with an unpopular answer.
The answer is, you don’t.
It’s my only consolation in a tough conversation on Wikipedia’s definition of “worthy of notice” that I can point to Wikipedia’s notability guidelines like a guilty child “he said it.”
So it seemed only sensible to start off my first post for Social Fresh on Wikipedia for marketing by talking about who should be doing Wikipedia work, who should read on and who should look elsewhere to achieve their goals.
Wikipedia is – by a huge margin – the most under-serviced social media channel, but at the same time it’s not for everyone.
Will you get value from Wikipedia?
Lets start out with if you can get what you’re looking for from Wikipedia. Most any organization with a solid PR function can get value from Wikipedia, but there are many corporations that simply have nothing to gain.
- Search: Wikipedia gets half its traffic from search and it’s on the first page of results in 95% of all Google searches. Poor quality Wikipedia pages on an organization often get millions of hits, because it’s the top third-party source of information in search.The flip side of getting so much traffic from search is a reader has to be familiar with the company before they punch the company name into that search bar. Companies that are virtually unknown won’t become known through Wikipedia. That doesn’t mean you need to be a celebrity or Fortune 100 company to get value from Wikipedia, but there has to be a market that’s interested in learning more about you.
- Branding: Wikipedia is literally a definition of a company. As “the people’s” encyclopedia, it also tells them how your brand is perceived. Wikipedia is a treasure trove for companies that really care about branding, but those who don’t care won’t find much that appeals to them here.There are some opportunities for product marketing, especially for companies the size of Cisco or IBM, but generally product marketers aren’t going to find what they want here.
Sometimes it may seem like Wikipedia favors larger companies, but it actually favors better known companies. This becomes really explicit as we get into Wikipedia’s requirements.
Will Wikipedia get value from you?
If I haven’t scared you off yet, then there is value for you on Wikipedia. Now to see if Wikipedia feels there’s value for them.
If there’s already an article on your company, but it’s not very good, please go straight to Go; collect $200. Improve that Wiki.
If no Wiki exists, then you have to determine if Wikipedia will feel the company deserves one based on Wikipedia’s notability requirements. These ascertain whether a topic is “worthy of notice” enough to have a Wiki on it.
Notability is complex and there’s many factors that influence how detailed a Wiki should be or if a company should have a more complex Wikipedia program. In a nutshell it’s based on authoritative, third-party sources of information on the company.
If The New York Times covered it, the topic is more likely to be considered notable.
What influences notability?
- Biographical articles (over quotes, mentions, articles or product coverage) that spell out things like the company’s history, how it was founded, financial performance, leadership and corporate culture.
- Trade publications, technically, aren’t suppose to count, but in practice this couldn’t be further from the truth. Even if it’s not the type of organization that’s achieved awareness in the masses, enough notability in your field works
- Authority publications – Just getting in a publication like The New York Times or the Wall Street Journal can often make an impression when those names are listed as a reference for your article.
If I haven’t scared you off yet, then keep reading. In some upcoming articles, we’ll cover steps for writing a Wiki, how to address negativity or conflict and other topics.
Is your business actively using Wikipedia for marketing?